Classical / Classical era · 1960
Mozart: Piano Concertos Nos. 20 & 24
Clara Haskil / Igor Markevitch
모차르트: 피아노 협주곡 20번·24번 · 클라라 하스킬 / 이고르 마르케비치
Why listen
Orchestral openings, independent wind writing and contrasting finale designs keep the two minor-key concertos from becoming portraits of the pianist alone.
Listen and read
Tracks · previews
English editorial edition
Album story
Haskil’s name can draw attention straight to the keyboard, but these concertos establish important events before the soloist enters. No. 20 begins with orchestral tension; in No. 24 the winds behave as participants with material of their own. Clara Haskil, Igor Markevitch and the Lamoureux orchestra invite attention to the ensemble before and between the piano’s appearances.
The performances were recorded in Paris in November 1960 and issued in 1961. They are distinct from Haskil’s recordings of the 1950s and compilations mixing different conductors. Mozart’s two minor-key piano concertos, No. 20 in D minor and No. 24 in C minor, each have three movements. The chosen six-track distribution belongs to the Philips Legacy reissue programme; identical mastering across earlier reissues is not asserted. Composition dates and recording dates remain separate.
Drama before the solo entrance
No. 20 does not immediately present a display at the keyboard. The orchestra acts first, before the piano introduces its material. Skipping to the solo entrance would remove the conditions of that encounter. The difference between a large ensemble and one keyboard need not become a contest with winners and losers. Entering an already charged setting is itself an event. Attend to the order of appearances written into the work, alongside the performer’s reputation.
The Romance contains another scene
The second movement cannot be understood from its opening melody alone. A more agitated central passage interrupts the lyrical stretches, changing the activity of piano and ensemble. Returning calm has acquired a history. That contrast makes the movement more than an interval of rest. Rather than applying a general image of Haskil’s gentleness, consider the differing demands that this particular movement places on keyboard and orchestra.
Winds and variation in No. 24
Oboes and clarinets share an unusually large wind group, whose contribution extends beyond reinforcing strings. Independent responses can be missed if piano is the sole protagonist. The finale develops through variations, unlike the rondo ending of No. 20. Ask what an idea retains while its setting changes. Such differences resist a single label of darkness. The six movements’ specific designs offer a fuller entrance than allowing the pianist’s late biography to explain every musical choice.
The album through its tracks
Compare the contrasting middle passage of No. 20’s Romance with the variation design of No. 24’s finale.
Piano Concerto No. 20, K. 466: II. Romance
The second track lasts approximately nine minutes thirty-four seconds. Labelling it peaceful after the opening melody can make its central agitation seem an exception, although that contrast belongs to the design. Hear the lyrical beginning, the different activity in the middle and the return together. Instead of isolating Haskil as a specimen of beautiful piano tone, consider what the keyboard does when the orchestral scene changes. More notes and a sustained melody are not competing achievements; they answer different situations. This is the 1960 Markevitch and Lamoureux performance, distinct from the movement recorded with Paumgartner. Remembering both departure and return lets an already familiar tune reveal the span of the movement around it.
Reference · Apple Music: selected six-movement Philips Legacy distributionPiano Concerto No. 24, K. 491: III. Allegretto
The sixth track is a variation finale lasting approximately nine minutes one second. Beyond awaiting another appearance of the theme, hear how piano and winds divide the work within a change. Different instruments and figures can turn a shared idea into another scene. Numbering every variation is unnecessary: distinguish what remains recognisable from the changing surface around it. Winds do not function solely as background beneath the soloist, so the movement continues to establish direction when the keyboard withdraws. Remember that this ending follows two earlier movements. Comparing it with No. 20’s finale reveals different ways of closing a minor-key concerto. The extended conclusion becomes a succession of particular decisions rather than a keyboard display alone.
Reference · Apple Music: selected six-movement Philips Legacy distribution
Listen next
Compare Walter’s Mozart Symphonies Nos. 40 and 41 for the role of winds in an orchestra without a solo piano.
Mozart: Symphonies Nos. 40 & 41 ↗References & editorial note
Written for English readers. Album facts are referenced below; listening suggestions are editorial interpretations. AI-assisted editorial review; not independently human-reviewed.
- Universal Music Japan: Haskil/Markevitch/Lamoureux, November1960 Paris sessions · www.universal-music.co.jp
- Eloquence official Philips Legacy: concertos20/24 on disc2 · www.eloquenceclassics.com
- Philips4842755 distributor: six movement timings and recording attribution · www.prestomusic.com
- LA Phil: Concerto20 form and contrasting Romance middle section · www.laphil.com
- LA Phil: Concerto24 wind scoring and variation finale · www.laphil.com
- Apple Music: selected six-movement Philips Legacy distribution · music.apple.com